Modelling the Relationships among Feedback Engagement, Writing Self-Efficacy, and Assessment Performance among EFL Learners: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65334/p7n0vj47

Keywords:

Feedback engagement, writing self-efficacy, assessment performance, Saudi EFL learners, structural equation modelling

Abstract

This study examined the relationships between feedback engagement, writing self-efficacy, and perceived assessment performance among Saudi EFL university students. Drawing on the Feedback Engagement Framework and Self-Regulated Learning theory, the research investigated how students’ engagement with feedback relates to their confidence in writing and their perceived achievement. A total of 725 undergraduates completed a validated questionnaire, and the proposed model was tested through structural equation modelling following exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The results indicated that feedback engagement positively predicted writing self-efficacy (β = 0.54, p < 0.001) and perceived assessment performance (β = 0.28, p = 0.002). Writing self-efficacy also had a positive effect on perceived performance (β = 0.42, p < 0.001) and partially mediated the relationship between engagement and performance (β = 0.23, p < 0.001). These outcomes show that students who engage actively with feedback develop stronger confidence in their writing abilities, which contributes to higher perceived performance. The study advances understanding of feedback as a motivational and self-regulatory process and offers practical guidance for encouraging learner autonomy, reflection, and improvement within formative assessment practices in Saudi higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Almayez , M. (2025). Modelling the Relationships among Feedback Engagement, Writing Self-Efficacy, and Assessment Performance among EFL Learners: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Applied Linguistics: Research, Measurement and Practice, 1(1), 45-73. https://doi.org/10.65334/p7n0vj47